H-1B salaries in Texas vs. California

Published November 10, 2026 · Data through FY2026 Q3

California and Texas are two of the largest states for H-1B employment, and they look very different in the data. This guide compares base salaries in certified H-1B Labor Condition Application (LCA) filings by worksite state, covering all jobs, software engineers and data scientists, along with wage levels, metro areas and the largest employers in each state.

The data covers fiscal years FY2025–FY2026, with FY2026 covering only Q1–Q3 (the federal fiscal year runs October 1 to September 30). Figures are annual base salaries from certified LCA filings, before tax, and exclude bonuses and stock. A certified LCA is not a visa approval, and one filing can cover more than one worker.

The headline comparison

Worksite stateFilings25th pct.Median75th pct.
California177,453$126,131$161,230$199,500
Texas141,087$91,520$112,923$140,039

The median California filing lists $161,230, which is $48,307 (about 43%) more than the Texas median of $112,923. The Texas median is below the median for all H-1B filings nationally ($122,699), while California's is well above it. The 25th percentile in California ($126,131) is higher than the median in Texas.

Same job, different state

The gap is larger, not smaller, when you compare the same occupation.

OccupationCA medianTX medianDifferenceCA higher by
Software Engineer$184,558$120,000$64,55854%
Data Scientist$164,273$103,813$60,46058%

Software engineers are the largest group in both states, with 60,109 filings in California and 53,971 in Texas. The 25th percentile for California software engineers ($155,000) is above the 75th percentile in Texas ($147,712). Data scientists show a similar pattern: 11,054 filings in California with a $164,273 median, and 8,429 in Texas with a $103,813 median.

Wage levels

Each LCA lists a prevailing wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent). The mix differs between the two states:

Wage levelCalifornia shareTexas share
Level I17.8%16.0%
Level II37.4%47.3%
Level III22.8%19.4%
Level IV21.9%17.4%

Texas filings are more concentrated at Level II (47.3% vs. 37.4%), and California has a larger share at Levels III and IV combined (44.7% vs. 36.8% in Texas). Because higher levels pay more, this explains part of California's higher median. The rest reflects different employers, roles and local prevailing wages, which the level shares alone cannot separate.

Metro areas

California metroFilingsMedian
San Jose, CA77,460$178,705
San Francisco, CA51,155$170,000
Los Angeles, CA25,999$116,000
San Diego, CA9,256$131,000
Sacramento, CA4,179$121,451
Riverside, CA2,818$100,000
Texas metroFilingsMedian
Dallas, TX81,487$112,923
Austin, TX30,625$130,000
Houston, TX20,135$105,976
San Antonio, TX3,994$100,024
College Station, TX769$85,840
El Paso, TX365$96,970

California's statewide figure is driven by the San Jose and San Francisco areas, which together account for 128,615 of the state's 177,453 filings. Outside those two metros, California medians are much closer to Texas. Los Angeles ($116,000) is only slightly above Dallas ($112,923) and below Austin ($130,000).

In Texas, Dallas is the largest metro by far, with more filings than San Jose. Austin has the highest median among Texas metros.

Top employers in each state

California employerFilingsMedian
Google10,941$191,000
Apple9,052$179,394
Amazon7,184$178,300
Meta6,768$214,032
Tesla3,289$164,000
NVIDIA3,068$191,469
Qualcomm2,754$143,187
Walmart2,219$152,148
Texas employerFilingsMedian
Amazon4,658$144,800
Infosys3,247$92,581
Cognizant3,024$109,886
Tata Consultancy Services2,195$85,530
EY2,155$141,255
Deloitte1,933$139,050
Fidelity Investments1,668$112,923
Goldman Sachs1,579$124,400

The employer mix is a large part of the story. California's biggest filers are technology product companies. In Texas, the list includes IT consulting and services firms (Infosys, Cognizant, Tata Consultancy Services, EY, Deloitte) and financial firms (Fidelity Investments, Goldman Sachs).

Amazon is the one employer near the top of both lists. Its California median ($178,300) is $33,500, or about 23%, higher than its Texas median ($144,800). That is a smaller gap than the statewide difference, which suggests that a good share of the state gap comes from which employers hire in each state.

Top occupations

OccupationCA filingsCA medianTX filingsTX median
Software Engineer60,109$184,55853,971$120,000
Systems Engineer / Architect11,191$150,00015,244$109,886
Data Scientist11,054$164,2738,429$103,813
QA Engineer5,400$135,7465,714$101,436

These four occupations are among the most common in both states. California's other top occupations include Electronics Engineer (median $162,347) and IT Manager ($237,141). Texas's include Programmer Analyst ($85,530) and Systems Analyst ($101,000).

In every occupation shown, California pays more at the median. The gap is largest for software engineers in dollar terms ($64,558) and smallest for QA engineers ($34,310). Systems engineer and architect roles are more common in Texas than in California (15,244 vs. 11,191 filings), which fits the larger role of consulting and services firms there.

What the comparison does not tell you

A statewide median blends many employers, cities and seniority levels. If you are weighing jobs in the two states, the most useful comparison is the same occupation, at a similar wage level, in the specific metros you are considering. The metro pages linked below go into more detail for software engineers in San Jose and Dallas.

Taxes and living costs

Texas has no state income tax; California does. All figures here are pre-tax base pay, so take-home pay differs from these numbers in both states. Housing and other living costs also differ, and this guide does not estimate them. A lower Texas salary may go further than the raw comparison suggests, but the size of that effect depends on your situation.

This guide is general information and is not legal, tax or immigration advice.

How we calculated this

We used certified H-1B LCA filings for FY2025 and FY2026 (Q1–Q3), grouped by the worksite state on each filing, and calculated medians and percentiles of annualized base wages. Metro and employer figures use the same filings. See the methodology.